MPAA Circling NC-17 For “Porno”…

July 19th @ 9:53 pm | | Scooped by Bill Minter

  • Well, we’ve not got it officially in writing. Searching for the term “Miri” over at the official MPAA website and their rating site reveals that “Zack And Miri Make a Porno” is currently “pending appeal”, but as of right now:

      Rating Reason: Rated NC-17 for some graphic sexuality.

    Of course, we’ve known of this or a while, given a few statements from Seth Rogen and Kevin himself, but this tells us that the MPAA did indeed grant the film this rating. “Pending appeal” tells us that the film’s producers have taken the “Clerks” route and have the MPAA taking a closer look, likely without any cuts, in the hopes they’ll be re-assigned an “R”. This isn’t new territory for View Askew, though the first scuffle in some time, as “Clerks II” surprisingly went through the ratings system with an “R” and no objections last time around, with Kevin very vocally expecting otherwise. A verbally graphic “Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back” scene with hookers was excised but eventually made it to DVD.

    Fans who have seen the film in screenings tell us that while it does push the envelope, they can’t see why the harsh rating is being given. Here’s hoping that the film can get re-rated to “R” as it stands, or, if any changes are needed, they can be such a few slight frames that we won’t miss anything essential. Either way, we know we’ll get to see it all (probably much more) on DVD, and are sure the final theatrical product will be a blast regardless of the rating. Our money’s on an “R”, likely without cuts, if the guys can put up a good enough fight — With all the Apatow gang’s been getting away from lately in their flicks, we’re thinking this one will make it by as well.

    Stick with News Askew as we continue coverage on this one.

2 Site(s) Referencing This Story...

  1. Pingback: MPAA Spanks Kevin Smith’s ‘Porno’ with an NC-17 Rating | Film School Rejects on July 22, 2008
  2. Pingback: Kevin Smith vs. The MPAA, Take 2 : Edward Champion’s Reluctant Habits on July 22, 2008

Here's What You Said: (4 Comments)

  1. Pubicbone69
    July 20, 2008 at 21:02

    I think were going to have to wait to DVD for full frontal Mewes.

  2. Jarrad
    July 21, 2008 at 06:29

    What I find odd (as an English guy) is that Americans put up with the blatant censorship of your most popular medium. I know it’s for commercial reasons and so on but having seen “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” no-one even knows who these faceless MPAA clowns are!.

    In the UK Clerks II was rated “15″ meaning that everyone over that age could see it. Personally I was amazed by that rating, but most of the Apatow movies you reference in the article are 15’s as well.

  3. bsr8j
    July 22, 2008 at 15:25

    Your story got picked up over at Paste (a great music/arts magazine) and they give the website a shout out: http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2008/07/-zach-and-miri-gets-served-nc-17-rating-pends-appe.html

  4. superwoman4u
    July 24, 2008 at 20:22

    I don’t understand how they can rate that as NC-17, when “Forgetting Sarah Marshall”, had a lot of frontal nudity. I personally haven’t seen a movie with a mans frontal nudity as much as what was in that movie, and it was rated R. I have no problem with nudity, and I’m a woman. I mean they seem to not have a problem showing woman nude in movies a lot.

Got Something To Say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.